### Summary of CESR Consultation Paper on MiFID Complex and Non-Complex Financial Instruments **Source**: CESR Consultation Paper, MiFID complex and non-complex financial instruments for the purposes of the Directive’s appropriateness requirements, published May 14, 2009, by the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), available at [ESMA website](https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/09_295.pdf). **Purpose**: The paper clarifies the classification of financial instruments under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) as complex or non-complex for the appropriateness test, which applies to non-advised investment services (e.g., execution-only transactions). This distinction determines whether firms must assess a client’s knowledge and experience to ensure the product is suitable, particularly for retail clients. **Key MiFID Requirements**: - **Suitability Test** (Art. 19(4), Level 1; Arts. 35, 37, Level 2): Applies to investment advice or portfolio management, requiring firms to assess client knowledge, experience, financial situation, and objectives. - **Appropriateness Test** (Art. 19(5), Level 1; Arts. 36, 37, Level 2): Applies to other investment services (e.g., execution or transmission of orders), requiring firms to evaluate client knowledge and experience for specific products. If deemed inappropriate, a warning must be issued. - **Execution-Only Exception** (Art. 19(6), Level 1; Art. 38, Level 2): For certain non-complex instruments, firms can provide services without the appropriateness test if the service is client-initiated, the client is informed of limited protections, and other conditions are met. **Instrument Classification**: - **Non-Complex (Art. 19(6), Level 1)**: - Shares admitted to trading on a regulated market or equivalent third-country market. - Money market instruments (e.g., treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper) not embedding derivatives. - Bonds or other securitized debt not embedding derivatives (e.g., traditional corporate/government bonds, traditional covered bonds). - UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities). - **Other Non-Complex (Art. 38, Level 2)**: Instruments not listed in Art. 19(6) may be non-complex if they meet four criteria: 1. Not a derivative or security giving rights to acquire/sell transferable securities or cash settlement based on indices (Art. 4(1)(18)(c) or Annex I, Section C(4)-(10)). 2. Frequent opportunities to sell/redeem at publicly available prices (market or independent valuation). 3. No liability exceeding the acquisition cost. 4. Comprehensive, understandable public information available. - **Complex**: Instruments embedding derivatives (e.g., convertible bonds, structured covered bonds, asset-backed securities), derivatives (e.g., options, futures, swaps), or those failing Art. 38 criteria. **Key Instrument Categories**: 1. **Shares**: - **Non-Complex**: Ordinary/preference shares on regulated markets. - **Complex**: Convertible shares, subscription/nil-paid rights, shares not on regulated markets, depositary receipts, stapled securities. 2. **Money Market Instruments, Bonds, Securitized Debt**: - **Non-Complex**: Treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, traditional bonds, traditional covered bonds (without derivatives). - **Complex**: Instruments embedding derivatives (e.g., credit-linked notes, convertible/exchangeable bonds, callable/puttable bonds, Spanish participaciones preferentes), asset-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities, CDOs), structured covered bonds. 3. **UCITS and Collective Investments**: - **Non-Complex**: All UCITS, regardless of underlying assets. - **Complex**: Non-UCITS (e.g., hedge funds, real estate funds) unless they meet Art. 38 criteria. Investment in derivatives does not automatically make non-UCITS complex. 4. **Other Products**: - **Complex**: Exchange Traded Commodities (ETCs) structured as contracts for differences, warrants, covered warrants. - **Not MiFID Instruments**: Deposits, loans, mortgages, life insurance (unless embedding derivatives reducing initial capital). **Issues and Recommendations**: - **Ambiguities**: The paper notes unclear definitions (e.g., “shares,” third-country market equivalence) and suggests MiFID’s approach to debt instruments may need review due to increased complexity in fixed-income markets. - **Retail Protection**: Emphasizes the need for firms to provide clear risk disclosures, especially for complex products or execution-only services. - **Consultation**: Invites feedback by July 17, 2009, with a final paper planned for autumn 2009. **Annexes**: - **Annex I**: Summarizes complex/non-complex classifications. - **Annex II**: MiFID Level 1 and 2 extracts. - **Annex III**: CESR’s technical advice. - **Annex IV**: European Commission Q&A, clarifying convertible bonds, deposits, and money market instruments. --- ### Cleansed Text The original text contained minor formatting issues (e.g., inconsistent dashes, special characters like “‟”). Below is a cleansed version of the summary, maintaining the original structure but correcting typographical errors and standardizing formatting: **Source**: CESR Consultation Paper, MiFID complex and non-complex financial instruments for the purposes of the Directive's appropriateness requirements, published May 14, 2009, by the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), available at [ESMA website](https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/09_295.pdf). **Purpose**: This paper clarifies the classification of financial instruments under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) as complex or non-complex for the appropriateness test, applicable to non-advised investment services (e.g., execution-only transactions). The distinction determines whether firms must assess a client's knowledge and experience to ensure product suitability, particularly for retail clients. **Key MiFID Requirements**: - **Suitability Test** (Art. 19(4), Level 1; Arts. 35, 37, Level 2): For investment advice or portfolio management, firms must assess client knowledge, experience, financial situation, and objectives. - **Appropriateness Test** (Art. 19(5), Level 1; Arts. 36, 37, Level 2): For other investment services (e.g., execution or transmission of orders), firms must evaluate client knowledge and experience for specific products, issuing a warning if inappropriate. - **Execution-Only Exception** (Art. 19(6), Level 1; Art. 38, Level 2): For non-complex instruments, firms can provide services without the appropriateness test if client-initiated, the client is informed of limited protections, and other conditions are met. **Instrument Classification**: - **Non-Complex (Art. 19(6), Level 1)**: - Shares admitted to trading on a regulated market or equivalent third-country market. - Money market instruments (e.g., treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper) not embedding derivatives. - Bonds or other securitized debt not embedding derivatives (e.g., traditional corporate/government bonds, traditional covered bonds). - UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities). - **Other Non-Complex (Art. 38, Level 2)**: Instruments not listed in Art. 19(6) may be non-complex if they meet four criteria: 1. Not a derivative or security giving rights to acquire/sell transferable securities or cash settlement based on indices (Art. 4(1)(18)(c) or Annex I, Section C(4)-(10)). 2. Frequent opportunities to sell/redeem at publicly available prices (market or independent valuation). 3. No liability exceeding the acquisition cost. 4. Comprehensive, understandable public information available. - **Complex**: Instruments embedding derivatives (e.g., convertible bonds, structured covered bonds, asset-backed securities), derivatives (e.g., options, futures, swaps), or those failing Art. 38 criteria. **Key Instrument Categories**: 1. **Shares**: - **Non-Complex**: Ordinary/preference shares on regulated markets. - **Complex**: Convertible shares, subscription/nil-paid rights, shares not on regulated markets, depositary receipts, stapled securities. 2. **Money Market Instruments, Bonds, Securitized Debt**: - **Non-Complex**: Treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, traditional bonds, traditional covered bonds (without derivatives). - **Complex**: Instruments embedding derivatives (e.g., credit-linked notes, convertible/exchangeable bonds, callable/puttable bonds, Spanish participaciones preferentes), asset-backed securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities, CDOs), structured covered bonds. 3. **UCITS and Collective Investments**: - **Non-Complex**: All UCITS, regardless of underlying assets. - **Complex**: Non-UCITS (e.g., hedge funds, real estate funds) unless meeting Art. 38 criteria. Investment in derivatives does not automatically make non-UCITS complex. 4. **Other Products**: - **Complex**: Exchange Traded Commodities (ETCs) structured as contracts for differences, warrants, covered warrants. - **Not MiFID Instruments**: Deposits, loans, mortgages, life insurance (unless embedding derivatives reducing initial capital). **Issues and Recommendations**: - **Ambiguities**: Unclear definitions (e.g., "shares," third-country market equivalence) suggest a need to review MiFID's approach to debt instruments due to increased fixed-income market complexity. - **Retail Protection**: Firms must provide clear risk disclosures, especially for complex products or execution-only services. - **Consultation**: Feedback invited by July 17, 2009, with a final paper planned for autumn 2009. **Annexes**: - **Annex I**: Summarizes complex/non-complex classifications. - **Annex II**: MiFID Level 1 and 2 extracts. - **Annex III**: CESR’s technical advice. - **Annex IV**: European Commission Q&A, clarifying convertible bonds, deposits, and money market instruments.